Post by account_disabled on Nov 26, 2023 4:24:08 GMT -5
subdomains (or within a domain), but not across domains. So site owners can suggest www.example.com vs. example.com vs. help.example.com, but not example.com vs. example-widgets.com. Sounds great—can I see a live example? Yes, wikia.com helped us as a trusted tester. For example, you’ll notice that the source code on the URL starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Nelvana Asia Mobile Number List
_Limited specifies its rel=”canonical” as: starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Nelvana. The two URLs are nearly identical to each other, except that Nelvana_Limited, the first URL, contains a brief messag
e near its heading. It’s a good example of using this feature. With rel=”canonical”, properties of the two URLs are consolidated in our display wikia.com’s intended version. And here are the questions answered in the comments section: Maile Ohye said… Hi guys, thanks for reading our post and making time to ask for clarification. We’ve tackled some of your questions below… @everyone: Just to clarify, rel=”canonical” helps Google select one URL and its contents from duplicates — it doesn’t accumulate the content from duplicates into one URL. If you se
t the rel=”canonical” in URL A and URL B to point to URL C, the contents of URL C won’t become “content from A + the content from B + the content from C.” With rel=”canonical”, we’ll likely index the content of C by itself, and then transfer to it the quality signals and linking properties from URL A and URL B. Hoosier said… We are making a change on our site that will move combine content from several different pages all onto one single page. We are planning on 301’ing the pages onto the new, combined page. I’m wondering if we can just use the canonical tag on the pages that will be combined – the combined content will reproduced exactly as it was on.
_Limited specifies its rel=”canonical” as: starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Nelvana. The two URLs are nearly identical to each other, except that Nelvana_Limited, the first URL, contains a brief messag
e near its heading. It’s a good example of using this feature. With rel=”canonical”, properties of the two URLs are consolidated in our display wikia.com’s intended version. And here are the questions answered in the comments section: Maile Ohye said… Hi guys, thanks for reading our post and making time to ask for clarification. We’ve tackled some of your questions below… @everyone: Just to clarify, rel=”canonical” helps Google select one URL and its contents from duplicates — it doesn’t accumulate the content from duplicates into one URL. If you se
t the rel=”canonical” in URL A and URL B to point to URL C, the contents of URL C won’t become “content from A + the content from B + the content from C.” With rel=”canonical”, we’ll likely index the content of C by itself, and then transfer to it the quality signals and linking properties from URL A and URL B. Hoosier said… We are making a change on our site that will move combine content from several different pages all onto one single page. We are planning on 301’ing the pages onto the new, combined page. I’m wondering if we can just use the canonical tag on the pages that will be combined – the combined content will reproduced exactly as it was on.